[Choice of antibacterial drugs in urinary infection].

Related Articles

[Choice of antibacterial drugs in urinary infection].

Urologiia. 2012 Mar-Apr;(2):4-8

Authors: Perepanova TS, Kozlov RS, Dekhnich AV, Palagin IS, Shevelev AN, Volkova EM, Égamberdiev DK

A rise in efficacy of the treatment of acute infection affecting the lower urinary tract (LUTI) and prolongation of recurrence-free interval in chronic LUTI can be achieved only by an optimal antibacterial treatment. The study was made of 987 community-acquired strains of uropathogens from the patients living in 20 cities of the Russian Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan (of them, 903 strains were from Russia). Enterobacteriaceae comprised 83.5%. E. coli infection of LUTI was found in 63.5% patients. The incidence of this infection was about the same both in uncomplicated and complicated cases (64.6 and 62.1%, respectively). Most active oral drugs against E.coli were phosphomycin (98.4%), furasidin (95.7%), nitrofurantoin (94.1%) and oralcefalosporins of the third generation (ceftibuten and cefixim). As to Enterobacteriaceae, only phosphomycin had activity against these bacteria above 90%, i.e. 91.5%. Furasidin and nitrofurantoin activity was 86.3 and 76.8%, respectively. From parenteral drugs, most active against E. coli were carbapenems (ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem. Strains resistant to them were not isolated. High in vitro activity was demonstrated also by cefoperason/sulbactam (97.4%), piperacillin/tasobactam (95.7%), cefalosporins of the third/fourth generation and amikacin (98.9%). Carbapenems were also highly active against Enterobacteroaceae. Empiric treatment of uncomplicated urinary infection should be performed with medicines which are not used for other indications.

PMID: 22876623 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]